Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image).
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is Google's fastest, most cost-efficient Gemini image model, built for high-velocity developer pipelines and rapid-fire visual exploration. It delivers text-to-image generation...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Context Window | 262,144 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-03 | 2026-06-30 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.06
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
$0.25
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.33
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
$1.50
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 4 26B A4B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.