← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 3n 4B vs R1 0528

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 3n 4B and R1 0528.

Google

Gemma 3n 4B

Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputs—including text, visual data, and audio—enabling diverse tasks...

View Full Specs
DeepSeek

R1 0528

May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemma 3n 4BR1 0528
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Context Window32,768 tokens163,840 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-202025-05-28

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.06

R1 0528

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.12

R1 0528

$2.15

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemma 3n 4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

R1 0528 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.