Gemma 3n 4B vs MiniMax M2.1
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 3n 4B and MiniMax M2.1.
Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputs—including text, visual data, and audio—enabling diverse tasks...
MiniMax M2.1
MiniMax-M2.1 is a lightweight, state-of-the-art large language model optimized for coding, agentic workflows, and modern application development. With only 10 billion activated parameters, it delivers a major jump in real-world...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 3n 4B | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Context Window | 32,768 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-05-20 | 2025-12-23 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3n 4B
$0.06
MiniMax M2.1
$0.30
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3n 4B
$0.12
MiniMax M2.1
$1.20
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 3n 4B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
MiniMax M2.1 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.