Gemma 3 4B vs Kimi K2.6
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2.6.
Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's next-generation multimodal model, designed for long-horizon coding, coding-driven UI/UX generation, and multi-agent orchestration. It handles complex end-to-end coding tasks across Python, Rust, and Go, and...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-20 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3 4B
$0.05
Kimi K2.6
$0.66
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3 4B
$0.10
Kimi K2.6
$3.41
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 3 4B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Kimi K2.6 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.