โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 3 4B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Gemma 3 4B (Google) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemma 3 4B: 5 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 1 Win
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemma 3 4B

$0.05 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...

View Gemma 3 4B Full Specs โ†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemma 3 4BHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderGoogleNous Research
Context Window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-03-132024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3 4B

$0.05

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3 4B

$0.10

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Gemma 3 4B is 20.0x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.8%vs78.8%+2.0% Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
79.0%vs77.0%+2.0% Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
56.2%vs54.2%+2.0% Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.6%vs39.6%+2.0% Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
80.4%vs81.8%+1.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 3 4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs8.4%+0.2% Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Gemma 3 4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons