← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Gemma 3 27B (Google) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemma 3 27B: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemma 3 27B

$0.10 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...

View Gemma 3 27B Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderGoogleNvidia
Context Window262,144 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-03-122026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3 27B

$0.10

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3 27B

$0.30

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$2.20

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemma 3 27B is 5.0x cheaper per input token than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
75.2%vs87.8%+12.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3 27B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
71.4%vs87.0%+15.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3 27B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
44.6%vs68.2%+23.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3 27B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
28.6%vs49.6%+21.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3 27B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
75.8%vs85.4%+9.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3 27B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
7.8%vs9.1%+1.3% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3 27B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

Gemma 3 27B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3 27B vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.