Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 4 Scout
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 3 27B and Llama 4 Scout.
Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B. It supports native multimodal input...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 82/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 350 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | beta |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-03-12 | 2025-04-05 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3 27B
$0.08
Llama 4 Scout
$0.10
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3 27B
$0.16
Llama 4 Scout
$0.30
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 3 27B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Llama 4 Scout Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸10M context causes significant VRAM pressure — recommend 4-bit quantization
- ▸Primarily designed for RAG, not agentic tool calling