Gemma 3 12B vs R1 0528
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 3 12B and R1 0528.
Gemma 3 12B
Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...
R1 0528
May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 3 12B | R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-03-13 | 2025-05-28 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3 12B
$0.05
R1 0528
$0.50
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 3 12B
$0.15
R1 0528
$2.15
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 3 12B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
R1 0528 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.