โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Google

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma 2 27B by Google is an open model built from the same research and technology used to create the [Gemini models](/models?q=gemini). Gemma models are well-suited for a variety of...

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

The Qwen3.5 series 397B-A17B native vision-language model is built on a hybrid architecture that integrates a linear attention mechanism with a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. It delivers...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemma 2 27BQwen3.5 397B A17B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Context Window8,192 tokens256,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-07-132026-02-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 2 27B

$0.65

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

$0.39

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 2 27B

$0.65

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

$2.45

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemma 2 27B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.