← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 3.5 Flash

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.60 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...

View Gemini 3.5 Flash Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderGoogleNvidia
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆512,288 tokens
Agent Suitability88/100N/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)200 msN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-192026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash

$1.50

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.60

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash

$9.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$3.60

💡 Cost Ratio: Nemotron 3 Ultra is 2.5x cheaper per input token than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
90.5%vs87.8%+2.7% Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
92.1%vs87.0%+5.1% Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
85.0%vs68.2%+16.8% Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
68.2%vs49.6%+18.6% Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
97.8%vs85.4%+12.4% Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.2%vs9.1%+0.1% Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra

Gemini 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

  • ▸Excellent multimodal performance — native video understanding
  • ▸Tool calling via Google's native function_declarations in Vertex AI

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.