Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta's latest class of model (Llama 3.1) launched with a variety of sizes & flavors. This 70B instruct-tuned version is optimized for high quality dialogue usecases. It has demonstrated strong...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 88/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 200 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-05-19 | 2024-07-23 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$1.50
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
$0.40
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$9.00
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
$0.40
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Excellent multimodal performance — native video understanding
- ▸Tool calling via Google's native function_declarations in Vertex AI
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.