Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemma 4 31B.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Context Window | 1,048,576 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 88/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 200 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-05-19 | 2026-04-02 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$1.50
Gemma 4 31B
$0.12
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$9.00
Gemma 4 31B
$0.35
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Excellent multimodal performance — native video understanding
- ▸Tool calling via Google's native function_declarations in Vertex AI
Gemma 4 31B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.