Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.20
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Grok 4.20.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google's premiere multi-modal model featuring a massive 2 million token context window. Engineered for deep code analysis, video indexing, and long-context reasoning.
Grok 4.20
Grok 4.20 is a reasoning model from xAI with industry-leading speed and agentic tool calling capabilities. It combines the lowest hallucination rate on the market with strict prompt adherance, delivering...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Grok 4.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Context Window | 2,000,000 tokens | 2,000,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 93/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 420 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | beta |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-20 | 2026-03-31 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Pro
$2.00
Grok 4.20
$1.25
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Pro
$12.00
Grok 4.20
$2.50
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Best model for massive context — 2M token window is class-leading
- ▸Tool calling requires explicit schema definition in Google AI Studio
Grok 4.20 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.