← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...

View Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Full Specs β†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderGoogleNous Research
Context Window1,048,576 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-192024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

$2.00

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

$12.00

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is 2.0x cheaper per input token than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
88.4%vs78.8%+9.6% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
87.6%vs77.0%+10.6% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
65.4%vs54.2%+11.2% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
46.8%vs39.6%+7.2% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
86.0%vs81.8%+4.2% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.9%vs8.4%+0.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons