โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 72B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash and Qwen 2.5 72B.

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash is Google's high-speed, cost-efficient multimodal model in the 3.1 generation, purpose-built for high-volume content synthesis, classification, and intelligent routing at scale. Featuring a 1-million-token context window, it can process large batches of documents, customer data, or multimedia content in a single inference pass, dramatically reducing pipeline complexity. At just $0.25/MTok for input, it is one of the most affordable routes to Google-caliber multimodal AI, making it an ideal backbone for production pipelines, data enrichment workflows, and high-frequency API integrations.

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 72B

Qwen 2.5 72B is Alibaba Cloud's flagship open-weight large language model from the Qwen 2.5 generation, delivering GPT-4-class performance across general reasoning, coding, mathematics, and multilingual tasks with strong Chinese-language superiority. It supports a 131,072-token context window and is available under a permissive Apache 2.0 license for both research and commercial use, making it one of the most popular open-weight alternatives to Llama for bilingual applications.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemini 3.1 FlashQwen 2.5 72B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability86/10088/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)150 ms280 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-202025-09-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash

$0.25

Qwen 2.5 72B

$0.40

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash

$1.50

Qwen 2.5 72B

$0.80

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8680.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Qwen 2.5 72B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
8850.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Qwen 2.5 72B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7820.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Qwen 2.5 72B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
6050.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Qwen 2.5 72B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9520.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Qwen 2.5 72B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
900.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Qwen 2.5 72B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธMost cost-effective Google model โ€” ideal for high-volume pipelines
  • โ–ธContext caching available via Vertex AI for repeated document processing

Qwen 2.5 72B Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธStrong bilingual (ZH/EN) performance โ€” best open model for Chinese-language tasks
  • โ–ธSelf-hostable via vLLM or Ollama with 4-bit quantization