โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 8B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B.

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash is Google's high-speed, cost-efficient multimodal model in the 3.1 generation, purpose-built for high-volume content synthesis, classification, and intelligent routing at scale. Featuring a 1-million-token context window, it can process large batches of documents, customer data, or multimedia content in a single inference pass, dramatically reducing pipeline complexity. At just $0.25/MTok for input, it is one of the most affordable routes to Google-caliber multimodal AI, making it an ideal backbone for production pipelines, data enrichment workflows, and high-frequency API integrations.

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.1 8B

Llama 3.1 8B is Meta's lightweight open-weight model from the Llama 3.1 generation, optimized for efficient deployment on consumer hardware and edge devices. Despite its compact 8-billion-parameter size, it delivers strong performance on instruction following, text summarization, and lightweight coding tasks. Lllama 3.1 8B is the most downloaded model in the Llama family and runs efficiently on laptops, single GPUs, and CPU via quantization โ€” making it the default choice for on-device AI applications and local prototyping.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemini 3.1 FlashLlama 3.1 8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability86/10074/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)150 ms80 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-202024-07-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash

$0.25

Llama 3.1 8B

$0.04

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash

$1.50

Llama 3.1 8B

$0.04

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8680.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
8850.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7820.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
6050.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9520.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
900.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 8B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธMost cost-effective Google model โ€” ideal for high-volume pipelines
  • โ–ธContext caching available via Vertex AI for repeated document processing

Llama 3.1 8B Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธPerfect for CPU/edge deployment โ€” runs on Raspberry Pi with quantization
  • โ–ธLimited tool calling vs larger models โ€” best for simple classification and chat