โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 405B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 405B.

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash is Google's high-speed, cost-efficient multimodal model in the 3.1 generation, purpose-built for high-volume content synthesis, classification, and intelligent routing at scale. Featuring a 1-million-token context window, it can process large batches of documents, customer data, or multimedia content in a single inference pass, dramatically reducing pipeline complexity. At just $0.25/MTok for input, it is one of the most affordable routes to Google-caliber multimodal AI, making it an ideal backbone for production pipelines, data enrichment workflows, and high-frequency API integrations.

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is Meta's largest open-weight language model and one of the most capable openly available models in the world. With 405 billion parameters, it achieves performance competitive with GPT-4 and Claude Opus across benchmarks spanning general knowledge, mathematics, coding, and multilingual tasks. Llama 3.1 405B is released under Meta's custom commercial license, supporting broad use cases including deployment via major cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure) and self-hosted inference with multi-GPU configurations.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemini 3.1 FlashLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability86/10090/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)150 ms550 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-202024-07-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash

$0.25

Llama 3.1 405B

$0.80

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash

$1.50

Llama 3.1 405B

$0.80

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8680.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 405B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
8850.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 405B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7820.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 405B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
6050.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 405B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9520.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 405B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
900.0%vsN/A
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Llama 3.1 405B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธMost cost-effective Google model โ€” ideal for high-volume pipelines
  • โ–ธContext caching available via Vertex AI for repeated document processing

Llama 3.1 405B Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธMassive model โ€” requires 8ร— A100 80GB for FP16 inference
  • โ–ธAvailable via Together AI, Fireworks, and Bedrock as managed API