← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Llama 3 8B Instruct

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Llama 3 8B Instruct.

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3 8B Instruct

Meta's latest class of model (Llama 3) launched with a variety of sizes & flavors. This 8B instruct-tuned version was optimized for high quality dialogue usecases. It has demonstrated strong...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 3 8B Instruct
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context Window1,048,576 tokens8,192 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-072024-04-18

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.25

Llama 3 8B Instruct

$0.14

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$1.50

Llama 3 8B Instruct

$0.14

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 3 8B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.