Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
This model offers four times the context length of gpt-3.5-turbo, allowing it to support approximately 20 pages of text in a single request at a higher cost. Training data: up...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 tokens | 16,385 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | beta | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-05-07 | 2023-08-28 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
$0.25
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
$3.00
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
$1.50
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
$4.00
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.