← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM 4.5V

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM 4.5V.

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...

View Full Specs
Zhipu AI

GLM 4.5V

GLM-4.5V is a vision-language foundation model for multimodal agent applications. Built on a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 106B parameters and 12B activated parameters, it achieves state-of-the-art results in video understanding,...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGLM 4.5V
ProviderGoogleZhipu AI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens65,536 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-072025-08-11

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.25

GLM 4.5V

$0.60

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$1.50

GLM 4.5V

$1.80

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.5V Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.