Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemma 4 31B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemma 4 31B.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Context Window | 1,048,576 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | beta | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-05-07 | 2026-04-02 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
$0.25
Gemma 4 31B
$0.12
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
$1.50
Gemma 4 31B
$0.35
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Gemma 4 31B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.