โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k.

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is Google's high-efficiency model optimized for high-volume use cases. It outperforms Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on overall quality and approaches Gemini 2.5 Flash performance across...

View Full Specs
OpenAI

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

This model offers four times the context length of gpt-3.5-turbo, allowing it to support approximately 20 pages of text in a single request at a higher cost. Training data: up...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens16,385 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-03-032023-08-28

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

$0.25

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

$3.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

$1.50

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

$4.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.