← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 2.5 Pro

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs β€œthinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...

View Gemini 2.5 Pro Full Specs β†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 2.5 ProHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderGoogleNous Research
Context Window1,048,576 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability90/100N/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)450 msN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-06-172024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$1.25

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$10.00

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is 1.3x cheaper per input token than Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
89.9%vs78.8%+11.1% Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
91.5%vs77.0%+14.5% Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
82.0%vs54.2%+27.8% Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
72.0%vs39.6%+32.4% Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
96.2%vs81.8%+14.4% Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.3%vs8.4%+0.9% Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

  • β–ΈLegacy model β€” migrate to Gemini 3.1 Pro for better tool calling and lower latency

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons