← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Fugu Ultra vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Detailed technical comparison between Fugu Ultra (Sakana AI) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Fugu Ultra: 6 WinsvsNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 0 Wins
Context Leader

Fugu Ultra

1,000,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$0.50 / MTok
Sakana AIactive

Fugu Ultra

Fugu Ultra is the higher-performance model in Sakana AI's Fugu family. Rather than a single monolithic model, Fugu is a learned multi-agent orchestration system: a language model trained to route...

View Fugu Ultra Full Specs β†’
Googleactive

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana 2," is Google’s latest state of the art image generation and editing model, delivering Pro-level visual quality at Flash speed. It combines advanced...

View Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationFugu UltraNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
ProviderSakana AIGoogle
Context Window1,000,000 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-06-242026-06-18

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Fugu Ultra

$5.00

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Fugu Ultra

$30.00

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$3.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 10.0x cheaper per input token than Fugu Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
85.4%vs75.4%+10.0% Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
84.6%vs71.6%+13.0% Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
65.8%vs41.4%+24.4% Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
47.2%vs28.8%+18.4% Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
86.4%vs76.0%+10.4% Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.9%vs7.9%+1.0% Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Fugu Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons