← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

ERNIE 4.0 vs DeepSeek V3.1

Detailed technical comparison between ERNIE 4.0 (Baidu) and DeepSeek V3.1 (DeepSeek). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

ERNIE 4.0: 0 WinsvsDeepSeek V3.1: 0 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek V3.1

163,840 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.25 / MTok
Baiduactive

ERNIE 4.0

ERNIE 4.0 (文心一言 4.0) is Baidu's most advanced large language model, representing the culmination of Baidu's decades of search and NLP expertise. Built on Baidu's proprietary knowledge-enhanced pre-training architecture, ERNIE 4.0 integrates deep understanding of Chinese language, culture, and domain-specific knowledge. It achieves GPT-4-class performance on comprehensive Chinese-language benchmarks spanning language understanding, reasoning, mathematics, and code generation. ERNIE 4.0 powers Baidu's Wenxin Yiyan consumer chatbot and is available via Baidu AI Cloud API for enterprise integrations.

View ERNIE 4.0 Full Specs β†’
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1 is a large hybrid reasoning model (671B parameters, 37B active) that supports both thinking and non-thinking modes via prompt templates. It extends the DeepSeek-V3 base with a two-phase long-context...

View DeepSeek V3.1 Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationERNIE 4.0DeepSeek V3.1
ProviderBaiduDeepSeek
Context Window128,000 tokens163,840 tokensπŸ†
Agent Suitability87/100N/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)380 msN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-302025-08-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

ERNIE 4.0

$1.20

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

ERNIE 4.0

$2.40

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.95

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: DeepSeek V3.1 is 4.8x cheaper per input token than ERNIE 4.0.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.0%vs80.0%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
ERNIE 4.0
DeepSeek V3.1
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.2%vs78.2%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
ERNIE 4.0
DeepSeek V3.1
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.4%vs55.4%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
ERNIE 4.0
DeepSeek V3.1
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.8%vs40.8%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
ERNIE 4.0
DeepSeek V3.1
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.0%vs83.0%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
ERNIE 4.0
DeepSeek V3.1
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs8.6%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
ERNIE 4.0
DeepSeek V3.1

ERNIE 4.0 Quirks & Gotchas

  • β–ΈSuperior Chinese-language understanding β€” best-in-class for China-market applications
  • β–ΈAPI requires Baidu Cloud account with Chinese phone verification

DeepSeek V3.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons