DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 4.7 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 4.7 Flash.
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...
GLM 4.7 Flash
As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Pro | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Zhipu AI |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 tokens | 202,752 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 94/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 280 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-24 | 2026-01-19 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro
$0.43
GLM 4.7 Flash
$0.06
Output Price per Million Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro
$0.87
GLM 4.7 Flash
$0.40
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸MoE architecture — cold-start latency on first request, use keep-alive
- ▸Best cost-performance ratio of any frontier model — strong tool calling for agentic use
GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.