โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Maverick.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1 is a large hybrid reasoning model (671B parameters, 37B active) that supports both thinking and non-thinking modes via prompt templates. It extends the DeepSeek-V3 base with a two-phase long-context...

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Context Window163,840 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-212025-04-05

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.21

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.79

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.60

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

DeepSeek V3.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.