DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Llama 3.2 11B Vision.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek-V3.1 Terminus is an update to [DeepSeek V3.1](/deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1) that maintains the model's original capabilities while addressing issues reported by users, including language consistency and agent capabilities, further optimizing the model's...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Meta's lightweight open weights vision model, optimized for mobile devices and local deployments. Capable of visual understanding, chart reading, and fast text generation.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Llama 3.2 11B Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Context Window | 163,840 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 72/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 150 ms |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-09-22 | 2024-09-25 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
$0.27
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Output Price per Million Tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
$0.95
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Lightweight vision model for edge/on-device deployments
- ▸Limited tool calling — use Llama 4 for production agentic tasks