โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek R1 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

DeepSeek R1: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek R1

163,840 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek R1

$0.70 / MTok
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek R1

A premier reasoning model employing large-scale reinforcement learning. Displays specialized math, coding, and logical validation capabilities comparable to OpenAI's o1.

View DeepSeek R1 Full Specs โ†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationDeepSeek R1Hermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekNous Research
Context Window163,840 tokens๐Ÿ†131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability78/100N/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)1800 msN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-01-202024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek R1

$0.70

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek R1

$2.50

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: DeepSeek R1 is 1.4x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
90.8%vs78.8%+12.0% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
92.8%vs77.0%+15.8% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
93.1%vs54.2%+38.9% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
62.1%vs39.6%+22.5% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
90.5%vs81.8%+8.7% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.3%vs8.4%+0.9% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

DeepSeek R1 Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธReasoning model โ€” not designed for high-frequency tool calling
  • โ–ธPair with a smaller model (V4 Flash) for routing and use R1 for complex reasoning only

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons