โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Command R vs Llama 4 Scout

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Command R and Llama 4 Scout.

Cohere

Command R

Command R is Cohere's lightweight, cost-efficient model engineered for high-speed enterprise integrations, productivity automation, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. Optimized for low-latency API tool use and structured JSON output, it is particularly effective in enterprise search and question-answering systems where fast, reliable responses are critical. With a 128,000-token context window and a price of $0.15/MTok for input, Command R provides strong RAG performance and multilingual support at a fraction of the cost of Command R+, making it the preferred choice for teams scaling intelligent document retrieval at high request volumes.

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B. It supports native multimodal input...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationCommand RLlama 4 Scout
ProviderCohereMeta
Context Window128,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Agent Suitability78/10082/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)200 ms350 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-03-112025-04-05

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Command R

$0.15

Llama 4 Scout

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Command R

$0.60

Llama 4 Scout

$0.30

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
7100.0%vs8720.0%
Command R
Llama 4 Scout
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
7300.0%vs8950.0%
Command R
Llama 4 Scout
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
5400.0%vs8100.0%
Command R
Llama 4 Scout
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
3500.0%vs6680.0%
Command R
Llama 4 Scout
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
7800.0%vs9450.0%
Command R
Llama 4 Scout
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
750.0%vs910.0%
Command R
Llama 4 Scout

Command R Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธCost-effective RAG model โ€” strong multilingual search performance
  • โ–ธLimited agentic capability โ€” use Command R+ for complex multi-step tool use

Llama 4 Scout Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธ10M context causes significant VRAM pressure โ€” recommend 4-bit quantization
  • โ–ธPrimarily designed for RAG, not agentic tool calling