โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Command R vs Llama 3.1 405B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Command R and Llama 3.1 405B.

Cohere

Command R

Command R is Cohere's lightweight, cost-efficient model engineered for high-speed enterprise integrations, productivity automation, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. Optimized for low-latency API tool use and structured JSON output, it is particularly effective in enterprise search and question-answering systems where fast, reliable responses are critical. With a 128,000-token context window and a price of $0.15/MTok for input, Command R provides strong RAG performance and multilingual support at a fraction of the cost of Command R+, making it the preferred choice for teams scaling intelligent document retrieval at high request volumes.

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is Meta's largest open-weight language model and one of the most capable openly available models in the world. With 405 billion parameters, it achieves performance competitive with GPT-4 and Claude Opus across benchmarks spanning general knowledge, mathematics, coding, and multilingual tasks. Llama 3.1 405B is released under Meta's custom commercial license, supporting broad use cases including deployment via major cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure) and self-hosted inference with multi-GPU configurations.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationCommand RLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderCohereMeta
Context Window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability78/10090/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)200 ms550 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-03-112024-07-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Command R

$0.15

Llama 3.1 405B

$0.80

Output Price per Million Tokens

Command R

$0.60

Llama 3.1 405B

$0.80

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
7100.0%vsN/A
Command R
Llama 3.1 405B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
7300.0%vsN/A
Command R
Llama 3.1 405B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
5400.0%vsN/A
Command R
Llama 3.1 405B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
3500.0%vsN/A
Command R
Llama 3.1 405B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
7800.0%vsN/A
Command R
Llama 3.1 405B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
750.0%vsN/A
Command R
Llama 3.1 405B

Command R Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธCost-effective RAG model โ€” strong multilingual search performance
  • โ–ธLimited agentic capability โ€” use Command R+ for complex multi-step tool use

Llama 3.1 405B Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธMassive model โ€” requires 8ร— A100 80GB for FP16 inference
  • โ–ธAvailable via Together AI, Fireworks, and Bedrock as managed API