← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Command R vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Command R and Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Cohere

Command R

Command R is Cohere's lightweight, cost-efficient model engineered for high-speed enterprise integrations, productivity automation, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. Optimized for low-latency API tool use and structured JSON output, it is particularly effective in enterprise search and question-answering systems where fast, reliable responses are critical. With a 128,000-token context window and a price of $0.15/MTok for input, Command R provides strong RAG performance and multilingual support at a fraction of the cost of Command R+, making it the preferred choice for teams scaling intelligent document retrieval at high request volumes.

View Full Specs
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationCommand RGemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderCohereGoogle
Context Window128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent Suitability78/10090/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)200 ms450 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-03-112025-06-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Command R

$0.15

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$1.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

Command R

$0.60

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$10.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
7100.0%vs8990.0%
Command R
Gemini 2.5 Pro
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
7300.0%vs9150.0%
Command R
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
5400.0%vs8200.0%
Command R
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
3500.0%vs7200.0%
Command R
Gemini 2.5 Pro
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
7800.0%vs9620.0%
Command R
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
750.0%vs930.0%
Command R
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Command R Quirks & Gotchas

  • Cost-effective RAG model — strong multilingual search performance
  • Limited agentic capability — use Command R+ for complex multi-step tool use

Gemini 2.5 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

  • Legacy model — migrate to Gemini 3.1 Pro for better tool calling and lower latency