Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.5
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Command A and Mistral Medium 3.5.
Command A
Command A is an open-weights 111B parameter model with a 256k context window focused on delivering great performance across agentic, multilingual, and coding use cases. Compared to other leading proprietary...
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Command A | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-30 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Command A
$2.50
Mistral Medium 3.5
$1.50
Output Price per Million Tokens
Command A
$10.00
Mistral Medium 3.5
$7.50
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Command A Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Mistral Medium 3.5 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.