Command A vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Command A and Gemini 3.5 Flash.
Command A
Command A is an open-weights 111B parameter model with a 256k context window focused on delivering great performance across agentic, multilingual, and coding use cases. Compared to other leading proprietary...
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at Flash-tier cost and speed. It is highly optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Command A | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 88/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 200 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-03-13 | 2026-05-19 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Command A
$2.50
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$1.50
Output Price per Million Tokens
Command A
$10.00
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$9.00
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Command A Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Excellent multimodal performance — native video understanding
- ▸Tool calling via Google's native function_declarations in Vertex AI