Command A vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Command A
Command A is an open-weights 111B parameter model with a 256k context window focused on delivering great performance across agentic, multilingual, and coding use cases. Compared to other leading proprietary...
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | beta |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-03-13 | 2026-05-07 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Command A
$2.50
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
$0.25
Output Price per Million Tokens
Command A
$10.00
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
$1.50
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Command A Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.