Codestral 2508 vs Llama 4 Scout
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Codestral 2508 and Llama 4 Scout.
Codestral 2508
Mistral's cutting-edge language model for coding released end of July 2025. Codestral specializes in low-latency, high-frequency tasks such as fill-in-the-middle (FIM), code correction and test generation. [Blog Post](https://mistral.ai/news/codestral-25-08)
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B. It supports native multimodal input...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Codestral 2508 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | Meta |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 82/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 350 ms |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | beta |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-08-01 | 2025-04-05 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Codestral 2508
$0.30
Llama 4 Scout
$0.10
Output Price per Million Tokens
Codestral 2508
$0.90
Llama 4 Scout
$0.30
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Codestral 2508 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Llama 4 Scout Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸10M context causes significant VRAM pressure — recommend 4-bit quantization
- ▸Primarily designed for RAG, not agentic tool calling