โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Codestral 2508 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Codestral 2508 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Mistral

Codestral 2508

Mistral's cutting-edge language model for coding released end of July 2025. Codestral specializes in low-latency, high-frequency tasks such as fill-in-the-middle (FIM), code correction and test generation. [Blog Post](https://mistral.ai/news/codestral-25-08)

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

The Meta Llama 3.3 multilingual large language model (LLM) is a pretrained and instruction tuned generative model in 70B (text in/text out). The Llama 3.3 instruction tuned text only model...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationCodestral 2508Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
ProviderMistralMeta
Context Window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-012024-12-06

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Codestral 2508

$0.30

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Codestral 2508

$0.90

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.32

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Codestral 2508 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.