Claude Sonnet 4 vs o1
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Sonnet 4 and o1.
Claude Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 4 significantly enhances the capabilities of its predecessor, Sonnet 3.7, excelling in both coding and reasoning tasks with improved precision and controllability. Achieving state-of-the-art performance on SWE-bench (72.7%),...
o1
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Sonnet 4 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 88/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 2500 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | beta | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-05-22 | 2024-12-17 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4
$3.00
o1
$15.00
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4
$15.00
o1
$60.00
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Sonnet 4 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
o1 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Reasoning model — high latency by design, not for real-time use
- ▸Best for complex math/code reasoning where accuracy > speed
- ▸Use o3-mini when you need reasoning with lower latency