← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly enhances the capabilities of its predecessor, Sonnet 3.7, excelling in both coding and reasoning tasks with improved precision and controllability. Achieving state-of-the-art performance on SWE-bench (72.7%),...

View Full Specs
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A90/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A450 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-222025-06-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4

$3.00

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$1.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4

$15.00

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$10.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8800.0%vs8990.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9150.0%vs9150.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7880.0%vs8200.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
6050.0%vs7200.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9500.0%vs9620.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
920.0%vs930.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

  • Legacy model — migrate to Gemini 3.1 Pro for better tool calling and lower latency