โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Command R

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Sonnet 4 and Command R.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly enhances the capabilities of its predecessor, Sonnet 3.7, excelling in both coding and reasoning tasks with improved precision and controllability. Achieving state-of-the-art performance on SWE-bench (72.7%),...

View Full Specs
Cohere

Command R

Command R is Cohere's lightweight, cost-efficient model engineered for high-speed enterprise integrations, productivity automation, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. Optimized for low-latency API tool use and structured JSON output, it is particularly effective in enterprise search and question-answering systems where fast, reliable responses are critical. With a 128,000-token context window and a price of $0.15/MTok for input, Command R provides strong RAG performance and multilingual support at a fraction of the cost of Command R+, making it the preferred choice for teams scaling intelligent document retrieval at high request volumes.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Sonnet 4Command R
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Context Window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A78/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A200 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-222024-03-11

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4

$3.00

Command R

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4

$15.00

Command R

$0.60

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8800.0%vs7100.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Command R
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9150.0%vs7300.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Command R
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7880.0%vs5400.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Command R
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
6050.0%vs3500.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Command R
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9500.0%vs7800.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Command R
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
920.0%vs750.0%
Claude Sonnet 4
Command R

Claude Sonnet 4 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Command R Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธCost-effective RAG model โ€” strong multilingual search performance
  • โ–ธLimited agentic capability โ€” use Command R+ for complex multi-step tool use