← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is Anthropic’s most advanced Sonnet model to date, optimized for real-world agents and coding workflows. It delivers state-of-the-art performance on coding benchmarks such as SWE-bench Verified, with...

View Full Specs
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent Suitability91/10090/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)380 ms450 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-09-292025-06-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5

$3.00

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$1.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5

$15.00

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$10.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8950.0%vs8990.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9280.0%vs9150.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
8000.0%vs8200.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
6250.0%vs7200.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9580.0%vs9620.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
930.0%vs930.0%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Excellent for long-form writing and nuanced document analysis
  • Slightly slower than Sonnet 4.6 — upgrade for production agentic use

Gemini 2.5 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

  • Legacy model — migrate to Gemini 3.1 Pro for better tool calling and lower latency