← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4 vs Step 3.7 Flash

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4 and Step 3.7 Flash.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is benchmarked as the world’s best coding model, at time of release, bringing sustained performance on complex, long-running tasks and agent workflows. It sets new benchmarks in...

View Full Specs
StepFun

Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is StepFun's latest high-efficiency multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model. It pairs a 196B-parameter language backbone with a vision encoder for native image and video understanding, activating roughly 11B parameters...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4Step 3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicStepFun
Context Window200,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-222026-05-28

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4

$15.00

Step 3.7 Flash

$0.20

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4

$75.00

Step 3.7 Flash

$1.15

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
9050.0%vs8450.0%
Claude Opus 4
Step 3.7 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9300.0%vs8600.0%
Claude Opus 4
Step 3.7 Flash
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
8540.0%vs6680.0%
Claude Opus 4
Step 3.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
7230.0%vs4400.0%
Claude Opus 4
Step 3.7 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9650.0%vs8580.0%
Claude Opus 4
Step 3.7 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
945.0%vs890.0%
Claude Opus 4
Step 3.7 Flash

Claude Opus 4 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Step 3.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.