← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Opus 4: 6 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.60 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is benchmarked as the world’s best coding model, at time of release, bringing sustained performance on complex, long-running tasks and agent workflows. It sets new benchmarks in...

View Claude Opus 4 Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Opus 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderAnthropicNvidia
Context Window200,000 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-222026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4

$15.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.60

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4

$75.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$3.60

💡 Cost Ratio: Nemotron 3 Ultra is 25.0x cheaper per input token than Claude Opus 4.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
90.5%vs87.8%+2.7% Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
93.0%vs87.0%+6.0% Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
85.4%vs68.2%+17.2% Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
72.3%vs49.6%+22.7% Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
96.5%vs85.4%+11.1% Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.4%vs9.1%+0.3% Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 🏆
Nemotron 3 Ultra

Claude Opus 4 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Opus 4 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Opus 4 vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Opus 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Opus 4 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Opus 4 vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.