Claude Opus 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4 and DeepSeek V4 Pro.
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 is benchmarked as the world’s best coding model, at time of release, bringing sustained performance on complex, long-running tasks and agent workflows. It sets new benchmarks in...
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 94/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 280 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-05-22 | 2026-04-24 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4
$15.00
DeepSeek V4 Pro
$0.43
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4
$75.00
DeepSeek V4 Pro
$0.87
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸MoE architecture — cold-start latency on first request, use keep-alive
- ▸Best cost-performance ratio of any frontier model — strong tool calling for agentic use