Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4 is benchmarked as the world’s best coding model, at time of release, bringing sustained performance on complex, long-running tasks and agent workflows. It sets new benchmarks in...
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model yet, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It excels at iterative development, complex codebase navigation, end-to-end project management with...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 94/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 350 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-05-22 | 2026-02-17 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4
$15.00
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$3.00
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4
$75.00
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$15.00
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Best balance of speed and capability — default for most Claude integrations
- ▸Computer-use (beta) feature enables autonomous UI interaction