Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 4 Maverick
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.8 and Llama 4 Maverick.
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's most capable generally available model in the Opus family. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and a 1M-token...
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta's next-generation open weights model. Delivers premium agentic capabilities, reasoning, and tool call compliance for local or self-hosted enterprise stacks.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.8 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 97/100 | 89/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 520 ms | 300 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | beta | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-05-27 | 2026-05-25 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
$5.00
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.15
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
$25.00
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.60
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4.8 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Best-in-class for autonomous code repair and multi-agent orchestration
- ▸Preview model — API may introduce breaking changes without notice
Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Self-hostable via Ollama/Docker — ideal for on-premise deployments
- ▸Requires specific system prompt for optimal function calling reliability