Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Scout.
Claude Opus 4.7
Opus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B. It supports native multimodal input...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 96/100 | 82/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 480 ms | 350 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | beta |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-16 | 2025-04-05 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
$5.00
Llama 4 Scout
$0.10
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
$25.00
Llama 4 Scout
$0.30
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Top-tier agentic coding model — excels at autonomous software engineering
- ▸Requires explicit tool_choice parameter for parallel function calling to work reliably
Llama 4 Scout Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸10M context causes significant VRAM pressure — recommend 4-bit quantization
- ▸Primarily designed for RAG, not agentic tool calling