Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Claude Opus 4.6
Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
The Qwen3.5 series 397B-A17B native vision-language model is built on a hybrid architecture that integrates a linear attention mechanism with a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. It delivers...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 95/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 500 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-02-04 | 2026-02-16 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
$5.00
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
$0.39
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
$25.00
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
$2.45
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
- ▸Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.