← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Small 3

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Mistral Small 3.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...

View Full Specs
Mistral

Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is a 24B-parameter language model optimized for low-latency performance across common AI tasks. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it features both pre-trained and instruction-tuned versions designed...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.6Mistral Small 3
ProviderAnthropicMistral
Context Window1,000,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Agent Suitability95/10084/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)500 ms120 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-042025-01-30

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$5.00

Mistral Small 3

$0.07

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$25.00

Mistral Small 3

$0.20

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
9250.0%vs8120.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
Mistral Small 3
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9450.0%vs8300.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
Mistral Small 3
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
8890.0%vs6800.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
Mistral Small 3
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
7980.0%vs4500.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
Mistral Small 3
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9750.0%vs8500.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
Mistral Small 3
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
965.0%vs830.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
Mistral Small 3

Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
  • Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema

Mistral Small 3 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Fastest TTFT at lowest cost — ideal for high-volume classification
  • Not designed for complex reasoning — route multi-step tasks to Mistral Large 3