Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Llama Guard 4 12B.
Claude Opus 4.6
Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...
Llama Guard 4 12B
Llama Guard 4 is a Llama 4 Scout-derived multimodal pretrained model, fine-tuned for content safety classification. Similar to previous versions, it can be used to classify content in both LLM...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.6 | Llama Guard 4 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 95/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 500 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-02-04 | 2025-04-30 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
$5.00
Llama Guard 4 12B
$0.18
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
$25.00
Llama Guard 4 12B
$0.18
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
- ▸Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema
Llama Guard 4 12B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.